ESSAY
Where Will Judgement Live?
AI can improve performance while quietly reducing the human practice that future judgement depends on.
·
September 9, 2026
·
13
min read
·
Notes on Human Agency (Substack)
A task can be more than a unit of work.
It may be where someone learns to notice an anomaly, question an easy answer, recognise when context matters or recover when something goes wrong.
Once AI takes more of that work, the output may improve while the practice underneath it fades.
The capability you stop practising may be the capability you later discover you still need.
An organisation may gain speed, consistency and efficiency while becoming more dependent on a system for judgement that once sat partly in people.
That matters when the model is wrong, unavailable, contested or confronted with a case it doesn’t understand.
The important question shifts from:
Does the AI perform?
to:
Before shifting more work to AI, ask what human practice the task currently sustains.
Where will that practice move once the system takes over more of the work?
Can people still intervene when the technology is absent or wrong?
Who owns the consequence if the capability has thinned by the time it is needed?
AI governance has become better at examining system performance, safety and control.
Less attention has gone to what implementation changes in the people who remain inside the work.
That gap matters.
The issue isn’t whether humans must keep doing everything they do now.
It is whether organisations know which capabilities still need to remain embodied in people, and why.
Organisations need to know what remains human, what is becoming dependent on technology, and what may no longer be there when circumstances change.
Somebody will have to exercise judgement then, with whatever has been left to form it.
WHERE THIS SITS
The Brain Commons
This essay belongs to The Brain Commons — a lens on the shared conditions that sustain or deplete human agency.
The conversation around this essay continues on

Some of this work belongs in rooms where decisions are made: universities, health systems, public institutions, leadership teams, conferences, committees and organisations holding a hard question.
David is available for keynotes, panels, lectures, webinars, facilitated enquiries, advisory conversations and collaborative work where questions of human capability, brain health, AI, judgement, care and institutional conditions are in play.